← Back to "C" terms

Cal

Categories: Criminal Law

Definition (1910 Edition)

475. But compare State v. Witham, 70

374, 26 Pac. 207; Losey v. Stanley, 83

17, 11 Pac. 470.

380, 7 Pac. 7638.

220.

78, 5 Pac. 623, 8 Pac. 599.

113, 388 Pac. 315, 28 L. R. A. 187, 46 Am.

96, 63 Pac. 143.

395.—Clear title. One which is not subject to any incumbrance. Moberts v. Bassett, 105 Mass. 408.

34, 70.Pac. 924; U. S. v. Planter, 27

550.

187; State v. Gesell, 124 Mo. 531, 27 S. W. 1101.

459, 64 Pac. 709, 84 Am. St. Rep. 62;

27, 73 Am. Dec. 565; Craig v. Bennett, 158 Ind. 9, 62 N. E. 273.

223, 37 Pac. 203, 26 L. R. A. 659; Grogan v. Hayward (C. C.) 4 Fed. 161; Gowan v. Philadelphia Exch. Co., 5 Watts & S. (Pa.) 141, 40 Am. Dec. 489; Alden Coal Co. v.

19, 48 Pac. 908. To oppose, repel, or resist.

42, 40 Pac. 24, "48 Am. &t. Rep. 110.—Direct interest. A direct interest, such as would render the interested party incompetent to testify in regard to the matter, is an inter est which is certain, and not contingent or doubtful. A matter which is dependent alone on the successful prosecution of an execution cannot be considered as uncertain, or otherwise than direct, in this sense. In re Van Alstine’s

554.

34, 28 Pac. 792, 15 L. R. A. -106; State v. Irwin, 5 Nev. 111.

307, 55 Pac. 1017.—Special election. An election for a particular emergency; out of the regular course; as one held to fill a vacancy arising by death of the incumbent of the office.

159. 24 Pac. 986; Liggett v. Ladd, 17 Or. 89, 21 Pac. 183.

103. .

270, 23 Pac. 318, 17 Am. St. Rep. 248; West v. West, 90 Iowa, 41, 57 N. W. 639;

472, 58 Pac. 164, 73 Am. St. Rep. 64; Hitchings v. Van Brunt, 38 N. Y. 338; Fifty

187; Hawk v. McCullough, 21

464.

437, 26 Pac. 208, 138 L. R. A. 137, 22 Am.

183, 73 Pac. 826; Sullivan v. Richardson, 33 Fla. 1, 14 South. 692.

484, 55 Pac. 158.

563, 74 Pac. 147.—Imputed notice. Information as to a given fact or circumstance charged or attributed to a person, and affecting his rights or conduct, on the ground that actual notice was given ‘to some person whose duty was to report it to the person to be affected, as, his agent or his attorney of record.

116, 70 Pac. 1065.—Imdependent cove= mant. See COVENANT.

58, 54 Pac. 389.

57, 60 Pac. 527; Smith v. Smith, 48 N.

142, 24 Pac. 659.—Personal judgment. One imposing on the defendant a personal liarae to pay it, and which may therefore be satisfied out of any of his property which is within the reach of process. as distinguished from one which may be satisfied only out of a particular fund or the proceeds of Pperculse property. Thus, in a mortgage foreclosure suit, there may be a persona] judgment against the mortgagor for any deficiency that may remain after the sale of the mortgaged premises. See

254;. Kennedy y. Townslev. 16 Ala, 248.— Just value. In taxation, the fair, honest, and reasonable value of property, without exaggeration or depreciation: its actual market value. State v. Smith, 158 Ind. 543, 68 N. E. 214, 63 L. R. A. 116; Winnipiseogee Lake, etc.,

376; Arms vy. Ayer. 192 Ill. 601, 61 N. E. 851, 58 L. R. A. 277, 85 Am. St. Rep. 357;

532, 81 Pac. 915, 19 L. R. A. 40.

611, 10 Pac. 179; Cummins v. Bulgin, 37 N. J. Eq. 476; Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Hay, 119 Ill. 493, 10 N. Bb. 29; McLoney v. Edgar, 7 Pa. Co. Ct. R. 29.

16, 46 Pac. 730, 35 L. R. A. 318, 56 Am

458; Kircher v. Murray (OC, G) 54 Fed. 617; Noe v. Card, 14 Cal. 576; Civ. Code La. 1900, art. 8556.

1, 62 Pac. 297; Shaw v. State, 125 Ala. 80, 28 South. 390; State v. Jones, 64 Iowa, 349, 17 N. W. 911, 20 N. W. 470.

554. : Read “Es

405.

255, 10 Pac. 674.

509, 26 Pac. 245; Kimball v. Rowland, 6 Gray (Mass.) 225; Davis v. Lampkin, 106

252, 91 Am. Dec. 577; Madera County v.

522, 56 Pac. 448; Matthews vy. State, 4 Ohio St. 540; -Benson v. McMahon, 127 U.. §. 457, 8 Sup. Ct. 1240, 82 L. Ed. 284: State v. McGinnis, 158 Mo. 105, 589 8. W. 83: State v. Burke, 73 N. C. 87; Reardon v.

139, 22 Pac. 987.

532, 27 Pac. 527, 138 L. R. A. 707, 25 Am.

554.

31, 44 Pac. 305, 58 Am. St. Rep. 155;

553. c

471; Kircher v. Murray (C. C.) 54 Fed. 624; Yates v. Houston, 3 Tex. 453; Rev. Civ.

118, 11 Pac. 599,

587. 34 Pac. 331; Western Union Tel.

654; Kelley v. ‘State, 6 Ohio St. 271:

1908, § 1899; B. & C. Comp. Or. 1901, § 736.

548, 44 Pac. 922.—Special warranty. A clause of warranty inse in a deed of lands,

597, 57 Pac. 687; Chamberlain v. Hemingway, 63 Conn. 1, 27 Atl. 238, 88 Am. St.

578.

578.
Source: Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition (1910) — Public Domain. UK commentary and modern updates are original additions. This entry is for educational reference only and does not constitute legal advice.