tes 6 DE. Root-v. Water Supply Co., 46: Kan. 83; ee Pac. 398; Lindsay v. Allen, _ Tenn: 4 . 171. See Haldeman v. U. S.. 91 ty nor 23 °L. Ed. 433.—Dismissal without rejudice. Dismissal] of a bill in equity without prejudice to the right of the complainant to sue agnin on the same cause of action. The ef fect of the words “without prejudice” is to prevent the decree of dismissal from operating as & Bar to ‘a subsequent suit. Lang A Warthg, 25 Ala: 625, 60 Am. Dec. 533.