197, 45 N. Y. Supp. 861; Justice ep. 576.

314, 88 N. Y. Supp. 862; Redus v. Hayden, 43 Miss. 614; Billings v. Baker. 28 Barb. (N. Y.) 343; Templeton v. Twitty. 88 Tenn. 595, 14 S. W. 435; Jackson v. John-

5098, 90 N. Y. Supp. 63.—Frivoleous defense. One which at first glance can be seen to be merely pretensive, setting up some ground which cannot be sustained by argument. Dominion Nat. Bank v. Olympia Cotton Mills (C. C.) 128 Fed: 182.-Meritorious defense. One going to the merits, substance, or essentials of the case. as distinguished from dilatory or technical objections. Cooper v. Lumber

338, 57 N. Y. Supp. 140, holding that three persons may be “many.”

689, 80 N. Y. Supp. 666; Braswell v. Comm., 5 Bush (Ry) B44: Kelly v. New York, 54 How. Prac. ¥.) 331. ;