Mo. App
Categories: Procedure
Definition (1910 Edition)
55; Rogers v. Spokane, 9 Wash. 168, 37 Pac. 300; Ifeavenrich v. aac 57
115, 78 S. W. 291; Hogan v. Stophlet, 179 Ill. 150, 53 N. EB. 604, 44 L. R. A. 809.
57. Constructive contempts were formerly called “consequential,” and this term is still in occasional use.
1, 78 8. W. 664.—Immate issue. In pleading. An issue taken on an immaterial point; that is, a_noint not proper to hatte = action, Steph. Pl. 99, 180; 2 Tidd, r.
540, 80 S. W. 24; Ingram v. Fuson, 118 Ky. 882, 82 8S. W. 606; Tod v. Crisman, 123 Iowa, 693, 99 N. W. 686; Harrigan v.
556; McDowell v. People, 204 Il. 499, 68 N. EB. 379.
115, 78 S. W. 291; Hogan v. Stophlet, 179 Ill. 150, 53 N. EB. 604, 44 L. R. A. 809.
57. Constructive contempts were formerly called “consequential,” and this term is still in occasional use.
1, 78 8. W. 664.—Immate issue. In pleading. An issue taken on an immaterial point; that is, a_noint not proper to hatte = action, Steph. Pl. 99, 180; 2 Tidd, r.
540, 80 S. W. 24; Ingram v. Fuson, 118 Ky. 882, 82 8S. W. 606; Tod v. Crisman, 123 Iowa, 693, 99 N. W. 686; Harrigan v.
556; McDowell v. People, 204 Il. 499, 68 N. EB. 379.
Source: Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition (1910) — Public Domain.
UK commentary and modern updates are original additions. This entry is for educational
reference only and does not constitute legal advice.