← Back to "R" terms

Rollings v. Cate, 1 Heisk

Definition (1910 Edition)

(Tenn.) 97; Joannin y. Ogilvie, 49 Minn. 564, 52 N. W. 217, 16 L. R. A. 376, 82 Am. St. Rep. 581; Burnes v. Burnes (C. C.) 182 Fed. 493.
Source: Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition (1910) — Public Domain. UK commentary and modern updates are original additions. This entry is for educational reference only and does not constitute legal advice.