396, 36 L. Ed. 186; Ewing v. Burnet, 11 Pet. 41, 9 L. Ed. 624; St. Louis, etc.,

20, 37 L. Ed. 999.

719, 48 L. Ed. 979. l

779, 35 L. kd. 473; Farmer v. Water Co., 56 Cal. 11.

396, 36 L. Ed. 186; Bouvier v.

219, 42 L. Ed. 644; Downs v. U.

566, 32 L. Ed. 895; In re Railway

510, 41 L. Ed. 937.

851, 86 L. Ed. 693; Zante Currants (OC. C.) 73 Fed. 189.

487, 28 L. Ed. 482; State y. Costello, 61 Conn. 497, 23 Atl. S68.—Criminal case. An action, suit, or cause instituted to punish an infraction of the criminal laws. State v.

517, 36 L. Ed. 340.—De facto domieile. In French law, permanent and fixed residence in France of an alien who has not ac-

545, 44 Ed. 873.

680, 38 Ed. 545; McCune v. Essig (C. C.) 118 Fed. 277.—Mineral land entry. Filing a claim to hold or purchase lands belonging to the public domain and valuable for

443, 27 L. Ed. 506: O’Brien v. State, 69 Neb. 601, 96 N. W. 650: Hubbell v. U.

862, 48 L. Ed. 191; Swan v. U. &.,

xl, 10.—EFurther ections. When a master ordinary in chancery made a report in pursuance of a decree or decretal order, the cause was again set down before the judge who made the decree or order, to be proceeded with. Where a master made a separate report, or one not in pursuance of a decree or decretal or-ler, a petition for consequential directions had to be presented, since the cause could not be set down for further directions under such circumstances. See 2 Daniell, Ch. Pr. (6th Ed.) 1233, note-—FEurther hearing. In practice. Hearing at another time.—Further maintenance of action, plea to. A plea grounded upon some fact or facts which have arisen since the commencement of the suit, and. which the defendant puts forward for the purpose of showing that the plaintiff should not further maintain

717, 28 L. Ed. 901; Murphy Mfg.

644, 43 L. Ed. 986; Emeric v. Alvarado, 64 Cal. 529, 2 Pac. 418; Hall v. Munger, 5 Lans. (N. Y.) 118; Corn Exch. Bank ¥. Blye, 119 N. Y. 414, 23 N. B 805; Salter v. Hilgen, 40 Wis. 865; Turrill v. Walker, 4 Mich. 183. “Irregularity” is the technical term for every defect in practical proceedings, or the mode of conducting an action or defense, as distinguishable from defects in pleadings. 3 Chit. Gen. Pr. 509.

652,

124, 44 L. Ed. 171.

108, 32 L. Ed. 464.

507, 80 L. Ed. 667.

824. 36 L 662; Lake Shore ete.,

1015, 30 L. Ed. 049.

48, 45 L. Ed, 126.—Property tax. In English law, this is understood to be an income tax payable in respect to landed property. In America, it is a tax imposed on property, whether real or personal, as distinguished from poll taxes, and taxes on successions, transfers, and occupations, and from license taxes. See

1114, 30 L. Ed. 237; Dranga v. Rowe, 127 Cal. 506, 50 Pac. 944; McClelland v.

678, 39 L. Ed. 759; Railroad Co. v.

928, 86 L. Ed. 795.—Trading' voyage. One which contemplates the touching and stopping of the vessel at various ports for the purpose of traffic or sale and purchase or abare of commodities on account of the owners and shippers, rather than the transportatiow of cargo between terminal points, which is called a “freighting voyage.” See Brown y, Jones, 4 Fed. Cas. 406. re ee eS,

1125, 38 L. Ed. 1047; Gloucestex

826, 29 L. Ed. 158.

398, 47 L. Ed. 567; Ronkendorff vy. Taylor, 4 Pet. 361, 7 L. Ed. 882; Evans v. Job, 8 Nev. 324; Bird v. Burgsteiner, 100