Supp
Categories: Criminal Law
Definition (1910 Edition)
526.
386; Amazon Irr. Co. v. Brieren, 1
160.
1001.
159.—Bodily heirs. Heirs begotten or borne by the person referred to; lineal descendants. ‘his term is equivalent to “heirs of the body.” ‘Turner vy. Hause, 199 Ill. 464, 05 N. E. 445; Craig v. Ambrose, 80 Ga, 134,48. B 1; Righter v. Forrester, 1 Bush (Ky.) 278.—-Bodi-
461; People v. Ward, 110 Cal. 369, 42 Pac. 894; Com. v. Headley, 111 Ky. 815, 64S. W. 744.
367.
331; In re Lenox's Estate (Surr.) 9 N.
824, 14 N. Y. Supp. 98; Allen v. Steiger, 17 Colo. 552, 31 Pac. 226.
858.
927..:
460.
4388; Civ. Code Mont. 1895, § 2292.
332.
562; Allen v. Pancoast, 20 N. J. Law, 74; Van Arsdale v. Van Arsdale, 26 N. J. Law, 423; Dunning v. Coleman, 27 La. Ann.
454; Lansing v. Fleet, 2 Johns. Cas. (N. Y.) 3, 1 Am. Dec. 142; Atkinson v. Jameson, 5 Term, 25; Butler v. Washburn, 25 N.
697; Atkins v. Elwell, 45 N. Y. 757;
10; Palmetto Lodge v. Hubbell, 2
1112.—Extra costs. In English prac tice. Those charges which do not appear upon the face of the proceed’ne® such as witnesses’ expenses, fees to counsel, attendances, court fees, ete., an affidavit of which must be made, to warrant the master in allowing them upon taxation of costs. Wharton—Extra feodum.
827; Massachieetts Ben. L. Ass’n v.
472; Plass v. Plass, 121 Cal. 181, 53
874.—Hold pleas. To bear or try causes. 3 Bl. Comm. 35, 298.
276; Davis v. Bibb County, 116 Ga. 23, 42 S. E. 408.
920.
960. In the case first above cited. the following description is given by Justice Field: “Mania is that form of insanity where the men-
223; Higgins v. Keuffel, 140 U. S. 428, 11 Sup. Ct. 731, 35 L. Ed. 470; Burke v.
602.—Letters testamentary. The formal instrument of authority and appointment given to an executor by the proper court, empowering him to enter upon the discharge of his office as executor. It corresponds to letters of administration granted to an administrator.
351; Collins v. Dispatch Pub. Co., 152
126; Danielson v. Roberts, 44 Or. 108, (ie Pac. 918, 65 L. R. A. 526, 102 Am. St. Rep
579; High v. State, 26 Tex. App. 545, 10 S. W. 238, 8 Am. St. Rep. 488; State y. Workman, 39 S. C. 151, 17 S. E. 694; State v. Brown, 2 Marv. (Del.) 380, 36 Atl. 458;
894.
11.—Comvarative negligence. See COMPARATIVE.—Oontributory negligence. Contributory negligence, when set up as a defense to an action for injuries alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence, means any want of ordinary care on the part of the person injured, (or on the part of another whose negligence is imputable to him,) which combined and concu with the defendant’s negligence, and contributed to the injury as a proximate cause thereof, and as an element without which the injury would not have occurred. Railroad Co. v. Y 153 Ind. 163, 54 N. E. 7
720; Kellogg v. Carrico, 47 Mo. 157;
482; Moulton’ v. Robison, 27 N. H. 554; Clay v. Lakenan, 101 Mo. App. 568, 74 8. W. 391; Claflin v. Continental: Works, 85.
863; Stephens v. People, 4 Parker Cr.
769.
492: Wheaton v. Weston (D. C.) 128
1044; Hurst v. Trow Printing Co., 2
347; Payn v. Beal, 4 Denio (N. Y.) 411; Powell v. Railroad Co., 16 Or. 33, 16
411; Aron v. Wausau, 98 Wis. 592, 74 N. W. 354, 40 L. R. A. 733; Lycoming F. Ins.
160.—Settling day. The day on which ‘transactions for the “‘account” are made up on the English stock-exchange. In consols they are monthly; in other investments, twice in the month.—Settling interrogatories. The determination by the court of objections to interrogatories and cross-interrogatories prepared to ‘be used in taking a deposition.—Settling issues. In English practice. Arranging or determining the form of the issues in a cause. “‘Where, in any action, it appears to the judge that the statement of claim or defense or reply does not sufficiently disclose the issues of act between the parties, he may direct the arties to prepare issues; and such issues shall, f the parties differ, be settled by the judge.’
5; Xenfa Branch Bank v. Lee, 7 Abb.
289; In re Hawley. 104 N. Y. 250, 10 N. E. 353.—Trustee acts. The statutes 13 & 14 Vict. c. 60, passed in 1850, and 15 & 16
1089.
386; Amazon Irr. Co. v. Brieren, 1
160.
1001.
159.—Bodily heirs. Heirs begotten or borne by the person referred to; lineal descendants. ‘his term is equivalent to “heirs of the body.” ‘Turner vy. Hause, 199 Ill. 464, 05 N. E. 445; Craig v. Ambrose, 80 Ga, 134,48. B 1; Righter v. Forrester, 1 Bush (Ky.) 278.—-Bodi-
461; People v. Ward, 110 Cal. 369, 42 Pac. 894; Com. v. Headley, 111 Ky. 815, 64S. W. 744.
367.
331; In re Lenox's Estate (Surr.) 9 N.
824, 14 N. Y. Supp. 98; Allen v. Steiger, 17 Colo. 552, 31 Pac. 226.
858.
927..:
460.
4388; Civ. Code Mont. 1895, § 2292.
332.
562; Allen v. Pancoast, 20 N. J. Law, 74; Van Arsdale v. Van Arsdale, 26 N. J. Law, 423; Dunning v. Coleman, 27 La. Ann.
454; Lansing v. Fleet, 2 Johns. Cas. (N. Y.) 3, 1 Am. Dec. 142; Atkinson v. Jameson, 5 Term, 25; Butler v. Washburn, 25 N.
697; Atkins v. Elwell, 45 N. Y. 757;
10; Palmetto Lodge v. Hubbell, 2
1112.—Extra costs. In English prac tice. Those charges which do not appear upon the face of the proceed’ne® such as witnesses’ expenses, fees to counsel, attendances, court fees, ete., an affidavit of which must be made, to warrant the master in allowing them upon taxation of costs. Wharton—Extra feodum.
827; Massachieetts Ben. L. Ass’n v.
472; Plass v. Plass, 121 Cal. 181, 53
874.—Hold pleas. To bear or try causes. 3 Bl. Comm. 35, 298.
276; Davis v. Bibb County, 116 Ga. 23, 42 S. E. 408.
920.
960. In the case first above cited. the following description is given by Justice Field: “Mania is that form of insanity where the men-
223; Higgins v. Keuffel, 140 U. S. 428, 11 Sup. Ct. 731, 35 L. Ed. 470; Burke v.
602.—Letters testamentary. The formal instrument of authority and appointment given to an executor by the proper court, empowering him to enter upon the discharge of his office as executor. It corresponds to letters of administration granted to an administrator.
351; Collins v. Dispatch Pub. Co., 152
126; Danielson v. Roberts, 44 Or. 108, (ie Pac. 918, 65 L. R. A. 526, 102 Am. St. Rep
579; High v. State, 26 Tex. App. 545, 10 S. W. 238, 8 Am. St. Rep. 488; State y. Workman, 39 S. C. 151, 17 S. E. 694; State v. Brown, 2 Marv. (Del.) 380, 36 Atl. 458;
894.
11.—Comvarative negligence. See COMPARATIVE.—Oontributory negligence. Contributory negligence, when set up as a defense to an action for injuries alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence, means any want of ordinary care on the part of the person injured, (or on the part of another whose negligence is imputable to him,) which combined and concu with the defendant’s negligence, and contributed to the injury as a proximate cause thereof, and as an element without which the injury would not have occurred. Railroad Co. v. Y 153 Ind. 163, 54 N. E. 7
720; Kellogg v. Carrico, 47 Mo. 157;
482; Moulton’ v. Robison, 27 N. H. 554; Clay v. Lakenan, 101 Mo. App. 568, 74 8. W. 391; Claflin v. Continental: Works, 85.
863; Stephens v. People, 4 Parker Cr.
769.
492: Wheaton v. Weston (D. C.) 128
1044; Hurst v. Trow Printing Co., 2
347; Payn v. Beal, 4 Denio (N. Y.) 411; Powell v. Railroad Co., 16 Or. 33, 16
411; Aron v. Wausau, 98 Wis. 592, 74 N. W. 354, 40 L. R. A. 733; Lycoming F. Ins.
160.—Settling day. The day on which ‘transactions for the “‘account” are made up on the English stock-exchange. In consols they are monthly; in other investments, twice in the month.—Settling interrogatories. The determination by the court of objections to interrogatories and cross-interrogatories prepared to ‘be used in taking a deposition.—Settling issues. In English practice. Arranging or determining the form of the issues in a cause. “‘Where, in any action, it appears to the judge that the statement of claim or defense or reply does not sufficiently disclose the issues of act between the parties, he may direct the arties to prepare issues; and such issues shall, f the parties differ, be settled by the judge.’
5; Xenfa Branch Bank v. Lee, 7 Abb.
289; In re Hawley. 104 N. Y. 250, 10 N. E. 353.—Trustee acts. The statutes 13 & 14 Vict. c. 60, passed in 1850, and 15 & 16
1089.
Source: Black's Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition (1910) — Public Domain.
UK commentary and modern updates are original additions. This entry is for educational
reference only and does not constitute legal advice.