368; rvis vy. Kroner, 18 Or. 414, 23 Pac, 260.—Public accounts. The accounts kept by officers of the nation. state, or kingdom, of the receipt and expenditure of the revenues of the government.

588—Adequate consideration. One which is equal, or reasonably proportioned, to the value of that for which it is given. 1 Story, Eq. Jur. $§ 244-247. An adequate consideration is one which is not so disproportionate as to shock our sense of that morality and fair dealing which should always characterize transactions between man and man. Eaton v. Patterson, 2 Stew. & P. (Ala.) 9, 19.—Adequate remedy. One vested in the complainant, to which he may at all times resort at his own option, fully and freely, without let or hindrance.

1, 36 S. W. 413.

537, 7 S. W. 210; Guillbeau v. Mays, 15

410.

1895, art. 8006e; Ky. St. 1908, § 575.

466, 22 S. W. 304; Insurance Co. v.

526, 4S. W. 865.

340; Noe v. Gard, 14 Cal. 576. The fol. lowing terms are also used: Donatio stionalis, a conditional gift; donatio relate, a gift made with reference to some service already 48 Tex. 340;) donatio stricta et coarctura, a restricted gift, as an es tate tail.

677,

110, 55 Am. Dec. 762.

634; Outter v. Waddingham, 22 Mo. 254.

ate 74 8. W. 530: Searl v. School Dist., 138 U. 553, 10 ‘Sup. Ct. 374, 338 L. Ed. 740. —Good apa A jury of which the members are selected from_the list of special jurors. See L R. 5 C. P. 155.—Good title. This means such a title as a court of chancery would adopt as a sufficient ground for compelling specific performance, and such a title as would a good answer to an action of ejectment by any

art. 579. :

574, 383 8. W. 652, 30 L. R. A. 765, 58

541, 68 S. W. 807; Marvin. v. McCuljum, 20 Johns. (N. Y.) 288; State v. Bollera, 112 La. 850, 386 South. 754.

123, 8 8S. W. 454.

154, 71 S. W. 14—Perpetual injunce~- tion. Opposed to an injunction ad intertm; an injunction which finally disposes of the suit, and is indefinite in point of time. Riggins v. Thompson, 96 Tex. 154, 71 8S. W. 14;

253; The John E. Mulford (D. C.) 18

639, 15 S. W. 1049. See Lazor.

682, 26 S. W. 983; Deeley v. Heintz, 169 N. Y. 129, 62 N. E. 158; Boyce v. Snow, 88 Ill. App. 405.

274, 68 Am. Rép. 758 . .

487.

218, 18 S. W. 578, 15 L. R. A. 262;

229, 10 S. W. 104; Weiser v. Weiser, 5

40, 19 S. W. 334; Easton v. Hyde, 13.

671, 27 S. W. 584; Davis v. Young, 2 Dana (Ky.) 299; McIntyre v. Sherwood, 82

iv. App: 314,16 8. W. 453; Mumfotd vy. Wright, 12 Colo. App.. 214, 55 ‘Pac. Téa Tomlin v. Hildreth, 65 N. J. Law, 438, 47

170. a ‘

277.—Trial jury. The jury participating in the trial of a given case; or a.jury summoned and impaneled for the trial of a case, and in this sense a petit jury as distinguished from a grand jury—Trial Hst. A list of cases marked down for trial for any one term.—Trial with assessors. Admiralty. actions involving nautical questions, e. fe actions of collision, are generally tried in gland before a judge, ite aay Masters sitting as assessors. Rose.

278; Ritchie v. Higginbotham, 26 Kan. 48.