King $4 We
339 leo N. W . 181, wn ‘by; ae ae v. on Co., 201 ee 78, oO run 94; Dairy Ass’n Y.
Terms beginning with "K" (81 total)
King, 155 Mo
406, 56 8S. W. 534; Dean v.
King. King’s Reports, vols
5, 6 Louisiana Annual. l
KING'S BENCH
KILLYTH-STALLION. A custom by which lords of manors were bound to provide a stallion for the use of their tenants’ mares. Spelman.
KING’S CHAMBERS 688
per bench.” It. consisted of a chief justice aod three. puisne justices, who were by their office the sovereign conservators of the peace und supreme coroners of the land. It was u remnant of the aula regis, and was no...
KING’S CORONER AND ATTORNEY
An officer of the court of King's bench, usually called “the master of the crown oflfice,” whose duty it is to file informuiions at the suit of a private subject by direction of the court. + Bl. Comm. 308, 300; 4 Ste...
Kinkaid, 40 Neb
178, 58 N. W. 700.—Geo to. In a statute, will, or other instrument, a direction that property shall “go to” a designated person means that it shall pass or proceed to
Kir
(Kirb. or Kirby). Kirby's Connecticut Reports.
Kissel v. Lewis, 27 Ind. App
302, 61 N. E. 209; Yates v. Lansing, 9 Johns. (N. Y.) 395, 6 Am. Dec. 290; Stuart v. People, 4 Tl. 395;
Kitch
(or Kitoh. Courts). Kitchin on Jurisdictions of Courts-Leet, Courts-Baron, etc.
Kitzh. Nat. Brev
222; Spelman; Termes dela Ley; 3 BI. Conm. 186.
KLEPTOMANIA
perform in protecting the rights of the crown; c€. g., by instituting proceedings for the recovery of land by writs of intrusion, (g. v.,.) and for the recovery of legacy and succession duties; but of late years admini...
Kn
(or Kn. A.C.). Knapp’s Appeal Cases (English Privy Council).
Knapp & Co
v. Campbell, 14 Tex. Civ. App. 199, 36 S. W. 765; Hill v. Drainage Co., 79
KNAVE
- KNAVE. A rascal; a false, tricky, or deceitful' person. The word originally meant a boy, attendant, or servant, but long-continued usage has given it its present signification.
Knickerbocker L. Ins. Co
v. Foley, 105 U. 8. 354, 26 L. Ed. 1055; Conner v. Citizens’ St. R.
Knickerbocker v. People, 102 Ill
233; Costigan v. Lunt, 104 Mass. 219.
Knight, 181 N. ©
717, 42 S. EB. 580, 50 L. R. A. 187.
KNOW LEDGE
of all contracts made therein, a member of the household being oné of the parties. Wharton. P
KNOWLEDGE
jury. Hatch v. Carpenter, 9 Gray (Mass.) 271. See Utley v.: Hill, 155 Mo. 282, 55 8. W. 1091, 49 L. R. A. 323, 78 Am. St. Rep. 568; Ohio Valley Coffin Co. v. Goble, 28 Ind.
Knox, 14 How. Prac
(N. Y.) 272; Ming v.
Knox, 5 Cal
256, 63 Am. Dec. 125.
Knutter v. Telephone Co., 67 N. J. Law
646, 52 Atl. 565, 58 L. R. A. 808.—Superior force. In the law of bailments and of negligence, an uncontrollable and irresistible force, of human agency. producing results which the person in uestion could not avoid; eq...
Koetting v. State, 88 Wis
502, 60 N. W. $22. In banking law, this kind of deposit is contrasted with a “general” deposit, as above: but in the civil law it is the antithesis of an “irregular” deposit. A gratuitous or naked deposit is a ba...
Kohl, 30 Ohio St
98; Whitaker v. Guano
Kohlhof v. Chicago, 192 Ill
249, 61 N. 4H. 446, 85 Am. St. Rep. 333; Challiss v. Parker, 11 Kan. 391; State v. Berdetta, 73 Ind. 185, 38 Am. Rep. 117; Pequignot v. Detroit (C.
Kramer, 33 Mise. Rep
209, 68 N. Y. Supp. 383.
Kress. Kress’ Reports, vols
166-194 Pennsylvania;—Kress’ Pennsylvania Superior Court.
Kroth, 87 Kan
235, 15 Pac. 221, 1 Am. 8t.
Ky
468, 78 S. W. 163, 111 Am. St. Rep. 259; 183. 134, 44 S. W. 444; Railroad-Co. v. Smith, 71 Ark. 189, 71 S. W. 947; State v. New 769, 57 S. W. 501, 50 L. R. A. 383; Parks. v. State, 159 Ind. 211, 64 N. E. 862, 59 L. R....
Ky. Law Rep
1509; Crawford County v.