Kames, Eq
146. 840; 1 Forb. Inst. pt. 1, p. 67.
146. 840; 1 Forb. Inst. pt. 1, p. 67.
797, 51 Pac. 290, 39 LL. R. A. 860; 343, 46 Pac. 700. It ig not in itself an “estate” in the technical sense, and therefore not the separate property or estate of the wife. Cizek v. Cizek, 69 Neb. 797, 99 N. 377, 1...
758, 41 Pac. 1116. 27, 44 Pac. 447. Fraud in law. is fraud in contemplation of law; fraud implied or inferred by law; fraud made out by construction of law, as distinguished from fraud found by a jury from matter of fac...
981.—Equity jurisprudence. That portion of remedial justice which is exclusively administered by courts of equity, as distinguished from courts of common law. Jackson v. Nimmo, 3 Lea (Tenn.) 609.—Equity of a statute....
509, 90 N. W. 243, 97 Am.
KAY. A quay, or key.
131 N. Y. 211, 80 N. E. ok . R. A. 689; Haggart v.
332, 52 Pac. 828; Simpson v. Robinson, 37 Ark. 182.
360. 528; Kota v. People, 136 Ill. 655, 27 N. KE. 53: Hogan v. State, 36 Wis. 242.—Malice in fact. Express or actual malice. Railway Co v. Behee, 2 Tex. Civ. App. 107, 21 S. W. 384;
832; Campbell v. Keys, 130 Mich. 127, 89 N. W. 720; Rempe v. Ravens, 68 Ohio St. 1138, 67 N. E. 282. 1057.
256, 48 L. R. A. 102; State v. Pomeroy, 73 Wis. 664, 41 N. W. 726: Barton v. Campbell, 54 Ohio St. 147, 42 N. BE. 698; Grand Rapids v. Hughes, 15 Mich. 57; State v. Leaver, 62 Wis. 387, 22 N. W. 576.
(or Kebl.). Keble’s English King's Bench Reports.
235, 62 N. E. 525; Hanifen v. Armitage (C. C.) 117 Fed. 85; McDonald v. Wilson, 59 Ind. 64; Wormley_y.. Wright
192; Woolsey v. Judd, 4 Duer (N. Y.) eo ereny property may be described as the right whic entitles an author and his assigns to all the use and profit of his composition, to which no independent right is, through any act...
KAST. In Swedish law. Jettison: a lHit- “keep” books. See Backus v. Richardson, 5 Johns, (N. Y.) 483.
1. To retain in one’s power or possession; not to lose or part with; to preserve or retain. Benson v. New York, 10
530. See Ang. Lim. $§ 200, 201. ;
(or Keilw.). King’s Bench Reports.
1. Sir John Kelyng’s English Crown Cases. 2 William Kelynge’s English Chancery Reports.
165; Jenks v. Dyer, 102
215, 71 S. W. 172; Ely v. Stannard, 44 Conn. 528; Martin v. Morris, 62 Wis. ao ee W. 525; Utley v. Fee, 33 Kan. 683, ac. ,
146-155 Massachusetts.
120, 47 N. BH. 376; Cowles v. Cowles, 56 Conn. 240, 13 Atl. 414.
493 (Gil. 358); Riddelsbarger v. Hartford F. Ins. Co., 7 Wall. 390, 19 L. Ed. 257.—Limitation of assize. In old practice. A certain time prescribed by statute, within which a man was required to allege himself or his a...
206; Com. v. Whitney, 11
214, 81 Am. Rep. 278; Tescher v Merea, 118 Ind. 586, 21 N.
185; Loventhal v. Home Ins.
699, 20 S. W. 312,17 L. R.A. 691, 30 Am. St. Rep. 902; Gunter v. Graniteville Mfg. Co., 15 8. C. 443; Bosqui v. Railroad Co., 131 Cal. 390, 68 Pac. 682; Aitna Ins.
(Mass.) 173; Toledo, etc. R.
287; Dunbar v. Meyers, 04 U. S. 197, 24 L. Ed. 34.
L. Rep. Kentucky Law Reporter.
kKenan’s Reports, vols. 76-02 North Carolina.
1061. —Parties and privies. Parties to a deed or contract are those with whom the deed or contract is actually made or entered into. By the term ‘“privies,” as applied to contracts, is frequently meant those betw...
19. But see Moran v. Hudnas Voy N. J. Law, 581. These costs are now abolished in England by 8t. 6 & 6 Vict. c. 97. Wharton.—Final costs. Such costs as are to be paid at the end of the suit; costs, the liability for whi...
378, 80 Am. Dec. 627; Merritt v. Karle, 29 N. Y. 115. 86 Am. Dec. 292;
390, 19 L. Ed. 736; Turner v. State, 1 Ohio St. 426; Sheldon vy. Sill, 8
65. (or Comm.). mentaries on American Law.
78; Co. Litt. 220e; Litt. § 852. 76. This is the point to be settled in determining the domicile or residence of a party. Id. 77.— us mor The intention to remain, or to delay.—Animus possidendi. The intention of po...
_ KIPPER-TIME. In old English law. The space of time between the 3d of May and the Epipbany, in which fishing for salmon in the Thames, between Gravesend and Henleyon-Thames, was forbidden. Rot. Parl. 50 Edw. ITI:
302; U. S. v. Barrett (D. C.) 111 Fed. 369; State v. Calvin, R. M. Charlit. (Ga.) 159; Mattison v. State, 3 Mo. 421.
100-116 Indiana ;—Kernan’s Reports, vols. 11-14 New York Court of Appeals.
60, 5 Atl. ; Chew v.
188... The king is the origin of all franchises.
(or Keyes). Keyes’ New York Court of Appeals Reports.
councillor, and was anciently called “clerk of the pprey seal,” but is now generally called the “lord privy seal.” Brown.—Keoper of the touch. The master of the assay in the English mint. 12 Hen. VI. c. 14.
15; Dalr. Feu. Prop. For its political and social relations, see Hall. Middle Ages; Maine, Anc. Law; Rob.
or open wear in a river, with a loop or narrow cut in it, accommodated for the laying of engines to catch fish. 2 Inst. 38; Blount.
499, 511; Springfield v.
214, 42 Atl. 394. —Trespass to title. The name of the action used in several of the states for the
210, 13 S. W. 59, 7 L. BR. A. 618.