U. §
324, 16 Sup. Ct. 801, 40 L. Ed. 984;
Terms beginning with "U" (110 total)
U. 8
546, 1 Sup. Ct. 418, 27 L. Ed. 254. v. Pope, 28 Fed. Cas. 680; Hamilton v. 100, 10 Sup. Ct. 681, 34 L. Ed. 128; Mobile County v. Kimball, 102 U. S. 691, 26 v. Greenwald (D. C.) 64 Fed. 8.—Oounty officers. Those Whos...
U. 8. , 26 L. Ed
266; Higgins v. Armstrong, 9 Colo. 38, 10 Pac. 232; Skillman v.
U. 8. § 8 (U
8S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 4).
U. 8. Comp. St
1901, p. 3589; U. 8. v. Hunter (C. C.) 21 Fed. 615.
U. 8., 146 U. 8S
370, 13 Sup. Ct. 136, 36 L.
U. 8S
v. Morel, 18 Amer. Jur. 286, Fed. Cas. 268, 3 Sup. Ct. 284, 27 I. Ed. 930; State v. Amidon, 58 Vt. 524, 2 Atl. 154. 574, 4 Sup. Ct. 202. 28 L. Ed. 262; 444, 12 Sup. Ct. 935, 36 L. Ed. 768; 678, 8 Sup. Ct. 992, 82 L. ...
U. C. 762, en araing: the Lez Pretoria, (q
v.) Tie 8, 8, 2.—Lex Pletoria. A law designed for the protection of minors against frauds and allowing them in certain cases to apply for the appointment of a guardian.
U. S. 118, 143, 26 L. Ed
827; In re Woodruff (D. C.) 96 Fed. 317; Hart v. Stribling. 25
U. S. 141, 21 Sup. Ct
48, 45 L. Ed. 126; Lawrence v. Hennessey, 165 Mo. 659, 65 S. W. 717; Boston & L. R. Corp. v. Salem & L. R. Co., 2 Gray (Mass.), 35; National Tel. News
U. S. 240, 15 Sup. Ct
77, 39 L. Ed. 1385; Esch v. Railroad Co., 72 Wis. 229, 39 N. W. 129;
U. S. 336, 2 Sup. Ct
682, 27 L. Ed. 746; Ticonic Bank v. Stackpole, 41 Me. 305. .
U. S. 348, 21 Sup. Ct
182, 45 L. Ed. 224 5
U. S. 349, 12 Sup. Ct
887, 86 L. Ed. 732. = masters. Officers of the English supreme court. who examine and allow or disallow items in bills of costs.
U. S. 389, 8 Sup. Ct
929, 31 L. Ed. 769; Griffith v. Maxfield, 66 Ark. 513, 51 S. W. 832;
U. S. 425, 6 Sup. Ot
1121, 30 L. Ed. 178; Gallup v. Fox, 64 Conn. 491, 30 Atl. 756; Reid v. Field, 88 Va. 26, 1S. E.-895; Ballard v.
U. S. 601, 15 Sup. Ct
912, 39 L. Ed. 1108;
U. S. 658, 26 L. Ed
250.—For eause. With reference to the power of removal from office, this term means some cause other than the will or pleasure of the removing authority, that is, some cause relating to the conduct, ability, fitness, o...
U. S. Ap
(or U. 8. App.). Appeals Reports.
U. S. v. Benner, 24 Fed. Cas
1084; Rhodes v. Walsh, 55 Minn. 542, 57 N. W. 212, 23 L. R. A. 682; Ex parte Sherwood, 29 Tex. App. 334, 15 S. W. 812.
U. S. v. Benson, 70 Fed
501, 17 C. C. A. 293 ; Girdner v. Walker, 1 Heisk. (Tenn.) 186;
U. S. v. Haggerty (C. C.) 116 Fed
515; Dupre v. Anderson, 45 La. Ann. 1134, 13 South. 743; City of Alma v. Loehr, 42 Kan. 368, 22.Paec, 424.
U. S. v. Kendall, 26 Fed. Cas
748; Appeal of Ervine, 16 Pa. 268, 55 Am. Dec, 499; Rhinehart v. Schuyler, 7 DL 519.
U. S. v. Knight Co., 156 U. 8
1, 15 Sup. Ct , 88 L : 325 5 Texas Brewin . Ve
U. S. v. Lewis (C. C.) 111 Fed
682; State vy. Zellers, 7 N. J. Law, 243.
U. S. v. Simons, 1 Abb
(U. S.) 470, Fed. Cas.
U. S. v. Sweet, 189 U. S. 471
23 mee Ct. 638, 47 io Ed, 907.
U. S. v. Winona & St. P. R. Co., 67 Fed
953, 15 C. C. A. 96; Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Bar den (C. C.) 46 Fed. 617.—Land district. A
U. S., 11 How
115, 126, 13 L. Ed. 627.
U. S., 118 Fed
144, 51 ©. C. A. 100. °
U. S., 161 U. 8
583, 16 Sup. Ct. 611, 40 L.
U. S., 9 Pet
735. 9 : ; Charles yv.
U. Tel. Co
(C. C.) 81 Fed. 243: Akerly v.
U.'S
v. Pusey, 27 Fed. Cas. 632.
U.C. Pr
(or P. R.). -Upper Canada Practice Reports.
U.C.QA. B. 0.8
(or U.C.0.8.). Upper Canada Queen’s (King’s) Bench Reports, Old Series.
U.S. St
atL. United States Statutes at Large.
UBI NON EST PRINCIPALIS
Ubi non est principalis, non potest esse accessorius. 4 Coke, 43. Where there is no principal, there cannot be an accessory.
ULENT
CONVEYANOCER. One whose business it is to draw deeds, bonds, mortgages, wills, writs, or other legal papers, or to examine titles to real estate. 14 St..at Large, 118.
Ulm
L. Rec. Ulman’s Law Record, New York.
ULNA FERREA
L. Lat. In old English law. The iron ell; the standard ell of iron, kept in the exchequer for the rule of measure.
ULTIMA RATIO
Lat. The last argument; the last resort; the means last to be resorted to.
ULTIMATUM
Lat. The last. The final and ultimate proposition made in negotiating a treaty, or a contract, or the like.
ULTIMUM SUPPLICIUM
Lat. The extreme punishment; the extremity of punishment; the punishment of death. 4 BL
ULTIMUS HZRES
Lat. The last or remote heir; the lord. So called in contradistinction to the heres provimus and the heres remotior. Dalr. Feud. Prop. 110.
ULTRA
ULLAGE. In commercial law. The amount wanting when a cask, on being gauged, is found not to be completely full. Lat. Beyond; outside of; in excess of.
Ultra Vires
UL-truh VY-reez
Beyond the powers. An act performed without legal authority, exceeding the powers granted by law or by a company's memorandum of association.
UNA VOCE
Lat. With one voice; unanimously; without dissent.
UNCONSCIONABLE BARGAIN. A
‘contract which no man in his senses, not
UNCONTROLLABLE IMPULSE
person to have prevented, but one not occasioned in any degree, either remotely or directly, by the want of such care or skill ag the law holds every man bound to exercise. Dygert v. Bradley, 8 Wend. (N. Y.) 478.