S. 461; 3 Kent, Comm
307, note. “To depart” does not mean merely to break ground, but fairly to set forward upon the voyage.
Category: International Law
Found 564 results · Showing 361–390
S. 468, 16 Sup, Ct
1064, 41 L, Ed. 230: Wirth v. State, 63 Wis. 51, 22 N. W. $60 ; Stryker v. Crane, 33 Neb. 690, 50 N. W. 1133. But “infection” is the wider term and in proper use includes “contagion,” and is frequently extended so as to include the local inau...
S. 580, 5 Sup. Ct
247, 28 L. Ed. 798. Adams v. Mississippi State Bank, 75 Miss. 701, 23
S. W. 797; Owen v. Boyle, 22 Me
47; State v. Wilson, 47 N. H. 101; Allen v. State, 10
S., 160 U. S. 128, 16 Sup. Ct
244, 40 L. Ed. 865; Lay v. State, 42 Ark. 110; U. S. v.
S., 162 U. S. 466, 16 Sup. Ct
859, 40 L. Ed. 1089; Stokes v. State, 18 Ga. 35; Clarke v.
SABBATUM. LL
Lat. The Sabbath; also peace. Domesday.
Sangster v. Kay, 5 Exch
386; Lawson v. Stat 55 Ala. 118; Abel v. State, 90 Ala. 633,
SANIS
said to have a sanction when there is a state which will intervene if it is disobeyed or disregarded. Therefore international law has. no legal sanction. Sweet. ;
SCEATTA
ination than a ‘shilling.
Schuchardt y. People, 99 Ill
501, 39 Am. Rep. 34.—Master in lunacy. In English law. The masters in-lunacy are judicial officers appointed by the lord chancellor for the purpose of conducting inquiries into the state of mind of persons alleged to be lunatics. Such inquiries usu...
Schultz v. State, 32 Ohio St
281; State v. Rozum, 8 N. D. 548, 80 N. W. 481; Fishel) v. Morris, 57 Conn. 547, 18 Atl. 717, 6 L. R.
SCIRE FACIAS
of introduction to some explanation, or directing attention to some particular rule. requiring the person against whom it is brought to show cause why the. party bringing it should not have advantage of such record, or (in the case of a scire facias...
Seabright, 28 W. Va
465; State v. Prather, 54 Ind. 63. -
SED QUZRE
Lat. But inguire; examine this further. A remark indicating, briefly, thet the particular statement or rule laid down is doubted or challenged in re spect to its correctness,
SED VIDE
Lat. But see. This remark, followed by a citation, directs the reader’s attention to an authority or a statement which conflicts with or contradicts the statement or principle laid down.
See 1 Steph. Comm
117. 271; 4 Kent, Comm. 111, 114. One who holds over, by consent given either expressly or constructively, after the determination of a lease for years. 4 Kent,
See 4 Bl. Comm
332; Avery v. Everett, 110 230, 231; 3 Kent, Comm. 194; 4 Steph. Comm. 168, 169, 219: Fagnan v. Knox, 40 N. Y. Super. Ct. 49; State v.
See Field v. United States, 9 Pet
182, 9 L. Ed. 94. ee ° . A oe
See In re Burrows, Kan
675, 7 Pac. 148; gia A v. Edwards, 67 Iowa, 619, 25 N.
See State v. Cushing, 17 Wash
544, 50 ea 512; State v. Brownles 84 fowa, 473, 51 N
See Steph. Crim. Dig
40; 3 Fast, 581; State v. Perkins, 6 Blackf. (Ind.) 20.
See Ward v. Joslin, 105 Fed
227, 44 C. ©. A. 456; Warwick v. Supreme Conclave, 107
See, also, Dunn v. People, 40 Ill
467; Chavannah vy. State, 49 Ala. 397; Stearnes v.
SENATUS
Lat. In Roman law. The senate; the great national council of the Roman people. ; ‘
SENESCALLUS
A seneschal; a steward; the steward of a manor. Fieta, 1. 2, c 72.
Septemd
is the last day of August. If any number be placed with it, it signifies that day in the former month which comes so much before the month named, as the tenth calends of October is the 20th day of September; for if one reckons backwards, beginning at...
Shaw, 39 Minn
153, 39 N. W. 305; State v. Morgan, 183 N. C. 748, 45 S. E. 1033.
Shaw, C. J., in Com
v. Webster, 5 Cush. (Mass.) 320, 52 Am. Dec. 711. And see further, Tompkins v. Butterfield (C. C.) 25 Fed 558: State v. Zdanowicz, 69 N. J. Law. 619, 55 Atl. 743; U.S. v. zones (C. C.) 91 Fed. 868; State v. May, 172 Mo. 630, 72 8. W. 918;
Short v. State, 80 Md
392, 31 Atl. 322, 20 L.