Taylor v. Boyd, 63 Tex
5883; Morgan's Co. v. State Board of Health, 118 U. S. 455, 6
Category: International Law
Found 564 results · Showing 511–540
TBADL
of certain kinds of toxins, venoms, and diseasegerms, obtained from the blood of an animal which has previously been treated with repeated minute injections of the particular poison or germ to be neutralized —Toxieomania. An excessive addiction to ...
Templeman, 90 Tex
277, 38 S. W. oF ; U.S. v. Patterson (C. C.) 55 Fed. 605; State v. Continental Tobacco Co., 177 Mo. 1, 75 S. W. 737.
The idea is not
spite or malevolence to the deceased in particular, but evil design in general, the dictate of a wicked. depraved, and malignant heart; not premeditated personal hatred or revenge towards the person killed, but that kind of unlawful purpose which. if...
The Oliver (D. C.) 22 Fed
849; Iowa vy. Illinois, 147 U. S. 1, 13 Sup. Ct. 239, 87 L. Ed. 35; Cessill v. State, 40 Ark. 504.
THESAURER. ‘Treasurer
8 State Tr. 691. ' THESAURUS, THESAURIUM. The
TONNAGE DUTY
exporting or importing of: any wares or merchandise -to be taken of the buyer. 2 Inst. 58.
TROY WEIGHT
son, 24 R. I.°817, 58 Atl. 98, 96 Am. St. Rep. 716; Waring v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 76 Pa. 496; Metropolis Mfg. Co. v. Lynch, 68 Conn. 459, 86 Atl. 882; Spellman vy. Richmond &
Truelsen, 39 Minn
310, 40 N. W. 67; Woolsey v. State, 30 Tex. App. 347, 17 S. W. 546.
Turner v. State, 114 Ga
421. 40 S. E. 308; Cr. Code N. Y. 1903, § 374.—Challenge propter affectum. A challenge interposed on account of an ascertained or suspected bias or partiality, and which may be either a principal challenge or a challenge to the favor. Harrisburg B...
TUTELA
Lat. In the civil law. Tutelage; that species of guardfanship which continued to the age of puberty; the guardian being called “tutor,” and the ward, “pupilius.” 1 Dom. Civil Law, b. 2, tit. 1, p. 260. ~—Tutela legitima. Legal tutelage; tut...
TUTELZ AOCTIO
Lat. In the civil law. An action of tutelage; an action which lay for a ward or pupil, on the termination of tutelage, against the tutor or guardian, to compel an account. Calvin.
U. S. v. Lewis (C. C.) 111 Fed
682; State vy. Zellers, 7 N. J. Law, 243.
UNIVERSAL 1187
UNIVERSAL. MHaving relation to the whole or an entirety; pertaining to all without exception; a term more extensive than “general,” which latter may admit of exceptions. See Blair vy. Howell, 68 Iowa, 619, 28 N. W. 199; Koen v. State, 35 Neb. 676...
UNSEAWORTHY. See SEAWORTHY
UNSOLEMN WAR. War denounced without a declaration; war made not upon general but special declaration; imperfect war. People v. McLeod, ] Hill (N. Y.) 409, 87 Am. Dec. 328.
USUS BELLIOCI
Lat. In international law. Warlike uses or objects. It is the usus bellict which determine an article to be contraband. 1 Kent, Comm. 141.
VALOR MARITAGII
Lat. Value of the marriage. In feudal law, the guardian in chivalry had the right of tendering to his infant ward a suitable match, without “disparagement,” (inequality,) which, if the infants refused, they forfeited the value of the marriage (va...
Vansant v. State, 96 Md
110, 58 Atl. 711; Wren v. Luzerne County, 6 Kulp (Pa.) 37.
Vatt. Law Nat
(or Vattel). Law of Nations.
W. 1198: Com
v. Poindexter ee 118 &. W. 048; Lewis v. State, 36 Tex. Cr. R. 37, 35 S.
W. 152; Graves v. Ford, 8 B. Mon
(Ky.) 113; Somers yv. State, 5 Sneed (Tenn) 488
W. 171; State v. Bulling, 105 Mo
204, 15 S. W. 367. —
W. 239; State v. Searle, 56 Vt
516; v. Lash, 16 N. J. Law, 380, 32 Am.’ Dec. 397:
W. 298; Com
v. Ferry, 146 Mass. 203, 15 N. . KE. 484; James v. State, 63 Md. 248; Lacey v. Palmer, 98 Va. 159, 24 S. E. 930, 31 L. R.
W. 381, 36 Am. Rep
803; State v. Popp, 45 Ma 433.
W. 414; Elliott v. Swartwout, 10 Pet
137, 9 L. Ed. 378; Pickett v. State, 60 Ala. 78;
Wadsworth v. Smith, 11 Me
283, 26 Am. Dec. 525; Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Delaware &
Walker v. Wells, 17 Ga
551, 63 Am. Dec 252; Chestnut v. Chestnut, 77 Ill. 349; Lyon v. Ford, 20 D. C. 535; State Treasurer v.
Wallace, 12 Ind
572; State v. Loechner. 65 569; Fitzpatrick v. U. 8. 7
Ward v. Iiallam, 2 Dall
217, 1 L. Ed. 355: Id., 1 Yeates Pa.) 329; Green v. Neal, 6