Clara County v. Southern Pac. R. Co
(C. C.) 18 Fed. 402; Swan v. Williams, 2 Mich. 434;
(C. C.) 18 Fed. 402; Swan v. Williams, 2 Mich. 434;
(it clearly appears.) In Scotch law. The name of a precept for giving seisin of lands to an heir; so called from its initial words. EIrsk. Inst. 3, 8, :71.
The constitutions of Clarendon were certain statutes made in the reign of Henry II. of England, at a parliament held at Clarendon, (A. D. 1164,) by which the king checked the power of the pope and his clergy, and greatly...
Lat. In old Scotch law. A making clear; the purging or clearing (clenging) of an agsise. Skene.
(N. Y.) 242; Walling v. Potter, 35 Conn. 185. And see Hote,
442; Weboe v. County Com’rs, 63 Me. 29.
100, 48 Pac. 563; Easton v.
100 Ga. 168, 28 §. B. 73, 39 L. R. 607 ; Railroad Co. v. - Ballentine, 84 Fed. o86; 28 0. C. A
Fraud is either actual or
Lat. Close, closed up, sealed. Inclosed, as a parcel of land.
the ‘parties attending,” or, shortly, “classtfying,” or “classification.” In practice the term is also applied to the directions given by the chief clerk as to which of the parties are to attend on each of th...
of trespass, and still retained in the phrase quare clausum fregit, (q. v.)
346, 35 Atl 1083, 35 L. R.
308, 10 S. W. 505, 3 L. R.
95, 53 Atl. 980; People v. Barnes, 114 N. Y. 317, 20 N. E. 609; In re Clark, 5 Fed. Cas. 854.
629, 84 Am. Dec. 591.—Tacit mortgage. In Louisiana. The same as a “legal” mortgage. See supra.—Welsh mortgage. In English law. A species of security which partakes of the nature of a mortgage, as there is a debt ...
MERCATORUM. A writ for the delivery of a clerk out of prison, who was taken and incarcerated wpon the breach of a statute merchant. Reg. Orig. 147.
2 Inst. 543.—Olericus be overseer or su-
840, 44 Atl. 476; In re
(South.) El. Cas. Clifford's Southwick Election Cases.
38, 49 Atl 52; Lawrence v. Cooke, 32 Hun, 126.
67, 29 South. 588, 86 Am 67, 29 South. 5 86 Am.
194, 20 S. E. 920.—Failure of evidence. Judicially speaking, a_ total “failure of evidence’? means not only the utter absence of all evidence, but it also means a failure to offer proof, either positive or inferen-
or defender, in suits at law and other diffculties; and was bound, in return, to pay him all respect and honor, and to serve him with his life and fortune in any extremity. as distinguished from those that are open or p...
1,085; Vallier v. Brakke, 7 S. D. 343, 64 N. W. 180.
53 Atl. 1086. 67 L. R. A. People v. Hyatt, 172 N. Y. 176, 64 N. EB. . 60 L. R. A. 774, 92 Am. St. Rep. 706. —Fugitive offenders. In English law. Where a person accused of any offense punishable by imprisonment, with ha...
282; Hartwell v. De Vault, 159
L. Ch. Common Law Chamber Reports, Ontarto.
429, 45 Pac. 398, 37 L.
CO-HEIR. One of several to whom an inheritance descends.
537, 38 S. E. 996, 54
116.—Exeoutory proceeding. In the law of Louisiana, a proceeding which is resorted to in the following ‘cases: When the creditors right arises from an act importing a confession of judgment, and which contains a priv...
542, 4 W. 86).—Ob= jects of a power. Where property is settled subject to a power given to any person or persons to appoint the same among a limited class, the members of the class are called the. “objects” of the ...
18646, 2290, 365c; Wing. Max. 752, max. 2038. A maxim applied to the practice of the courts, to the ancient and established forms of pleading and conveyancing, and to professional usage generally. Id. 752-755. Lord Coke ...
414, 47 N. E. 2, 37 lL. R. A. 381, 62 Am. St. Re’ 532.
v. Moore (C. C.) 11 Fed. 251.
(Cr C.P. Div.). Common Pleas Division, English Law Reports (1875-1880).
480, 29 Pac. 906. As used in the liquor laws, “furnish” means to provide in any way, and includes giving as well as selling. State v. Freeman, 27 Vt. 520;
485. 1 Sup. Ct, 582, 27 L. Ed. 337; Lyon v. Guild. 5 Heisk. (Tenn.) 182;
116, 20 South. 419, 88 L. BR.
289; Monongahela Nav. Co. v. U. S., 148 U. 8. 312, 13 Sup. Ct. 622, 37 L. Ed. 468;
875, 30 L. E& 967; Prince v. Lamb, 128 Cal. 120, 60. Paé. 689; Maryland Ice Co. v. Arctic Ice Mach.
246, 9 L. R. A. 711; Baltimore & P. R. Co. v. Fifth Ba tist Church, 137 U. 8. 568, 11 Sup. Ct. 1835, 84 L. Ed. 784; Id. 108 U. S. 317, 2 Sup.
368, 31 8S. EB. 629.
456; Walrath v. Champion Min.
321, 380 N. E. 308; Wright v. New York Cent. R. Co., 25 N. Y. 565; Glover v. Kansas City Bolt Co., 153 Mo. 327, 55 8. W. 88; Brunell v. Southern Pac. Co., 34 Or. 256, 56 Pac. 129; Doughty v. Penobscot Log
267. Local customs are such as prevail only in some particular district or locality, or in some city, county, or town. ‘Bodfish v. Fox, 23 Me. 95, 39 Am. Dec. 611; Clou v. Wing, 2 Ariz. 371, 17 Pac. 457. Part r customs...
430, 45 N. E. 662; State v. Skil-
344, 47 N. E. 1060; Cairo, etce.,
333, 25 Pac. 702, 11 L. R. A. 615, 22 Am. St. Rep. 403; Pielke v. Railroad Co., 5 Dak. 444, 41 N. W. 669; Railroad Co. v.