State, 118 Ind
426, 21 N. KB. 267.4 L. R.
426, 21 N. KB. 267.4 L. R.
641, 96 N. W. 424; Genz v.
46, 32 N. E. 780.—A tive relief. Relief, benefit, or compensation which may be granted to the defendant in a judgment or decree in accordance with the facts established in his favor; such as may Drover: be given within...
321, 87 N. E. 1089; hanson v.. Vernon, 27 Iowa. 28, 1 Am. Rep. 215; Bonaparte v. State, 63 Md.-465; Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. State, 49 Ohio St. 189, 30 N. E. 435, 16 L. R. A. 880; Ilinols Cent. R. Co. v. Decatur, 147 ...
83; Champlin v. Champlin, 2 Edw. Ch. (N. Y.) 329.-
60; Mitchell v. Com., 33 3938; U.S. v. Soto, 7 Ariz. 230, 64 Pac. 420.
609, 28 N. W. 271.—Mania a pota. Delirium tremens, or a species of temporary insanity resulting as a secondary effect produced by the excessive and protracted indulence in intoxicating liquors. See State v. Hurey, Hous...
(Tenn.) 496; Commonwealth vy. Arnold, 4 Pick. (Mass.) 251; State v. Herryford, 19 Mo. 377; State v. Lewis, 12 Wis, 434.
98; Ulrich v. Ulrich, 136 N.
692; Harless v. U. 8., Morris 692; State v. Lovell, 39 N.
19; U. 8. v. Smith, 27 Fed. Cas, 1149; Patterson v. State, 12 Tex. App. 224,
279, 8 S. W. 539, 58 Am.
623, 9 S. W. 69; Lowe v.
370, 8 South. 837, 26 Am. St.
488, 61 N. EK. 693; Trustees of Schools v. Schroll, 120 I1L 509, 12 N.
358; Johnston v. Riley, 13 Ga. 97.
124; Scanlan v. Wright, 13
358, 13 South. 955; State v. Davis, 14 R. I. 281; People v. Sanborn, 14
167, 16 South. 80, 43 Am. St.
676, 53 N. W. 595, 17 L. R.
476, 14 Am. Rep. 374; Hill v.
637, 23 South. 119; Graffty v.
588; Com. v. Newell, 7 610; Houston v. Com., 87 Va. 257, 12 8S. B. 385; Thomas v. State, 91 Ala. 84, 9 South. 81; Hickey v. State, 23
17; Crane v. Reeder, 21 Mich. 70, 4 Am. Rep. 430; Civ. Code Ga. 1895, § 8575.
378, 61 N. W. 699; State v.
789.—Challenge to the favor. Is where the party has no principal challenge, but objects only some probable circumstances of suspicion, as acquaintance, and the like, the validity of which must be left to the determinat...
18; Bank y. Wheaton, 4 R. I. 33. . 347; Goldman. v. Com., 100 Va. 865, 42 S. E. 923; State v. Hand, 1 Marv. (Del.) 545, 41 Atl. 192; State v. Dickson, 78
264; Rallroad Co. v. Trust Co., 82 Md. 535, 84 Atl. 778, 88 L. R. A. 97.
180; Learned-Letcher Lumber
476; Kerrick v. Van Dusen, 32 Minn. 317, 20 N. W. 228; Com. v. Pine, 3 Pa. Law J. 412. In the memorandum clause in policies of insurance it includes pease and beans, but not rice. Park, Ins. 112; Scott v. Bourdillion, 2 ...
472; Fife v. State, 31 Ark. 455, 25 Am. Rep. 556; Andrews v. State, 3 Heisk. (Tenn.) 179, 8 Am. Rep. 8; Aymette v. State, 2 Humph. (Tenn.) 154.
756. Again, in the law of wills, there is a difference between revocation and alteration. If what is done simply takes away what was given before, or a part of it, itis a revocation; but if it gives something in addition...
79; Atwood v. Charlton, 21
30; Curley v. Com., 84 Pa. 156;
846, 7 South. 275; Clark v.
444; Com. v. Kimball, 7 Metc. (Mass.) 808. . 58; Emporia v. Volmer, 12
150, 34 Pac. 551, 22 L. R.
380, 50 Atl. 1118; Butler v.
140, 20 South. 860; Carleton v.
(Ind.) 330; Blair v. Marye, 80 Va. 495; -Worthy v. Barrett, 6 N. G 202; People v. Duane, 121 N. Y. 367, 24 N. br. &5; U. 8. v. Hartwell, 6 Wall. 393, 18
164,9 S. BE 1091; Waters v.
636; Com. v. Marzynski, 149 Mass, 68, 21 N. E. 228.
250, 24 S. W. 397, 22 L. R. A. 483. 250, 24 S. W. 397, 22 L. R.
112, 8 South. 56; Clifford v.
407, 16 8.. W. 471, 13 L. R:
617, 20 S. W. 169; State v.
73, 9 South. 400, 25 Am. St.
106, 28 8. W. 312; State v.
15.—Public purposo. In the law of taxation, eminent domain, etc., this is a term of classification to distinguish the objects for which, according to settled usage, the government is to provide, from those which, by th...
6 Fed. Cas. 8982; Daniel v. Vaccaro. 41 Ark. 320.—Excessive damages. Damages awarded by a jury which are grossly in excess of the amount warranted by law on the facts and circumstances of the case; unreasonable or outr...