B. 800; Powell v. State, 101 Ga
9, 29 S. B. 309, 65 Am. St. Rep. 277; Jastrzembski v.
Found 564 results · Showing 31–60
9, 29 S. B. 309, 65 Am. St. Rep. 277; Jastrzembski v.
207; State v. Cody, 18 Or. 506, 23 184. is is suppo to the judicial phrase “cursa advisari vul?, v.) 1 Chit. Bl. Comm. 184, note. 216
Fr. In medical jurisprudence. A test for pregnancy by palpation with the finger inserted in the vagina to the mouth of the uterus. The tip of the finger being quickly jerked upward, the
fetus, if one be present, can be felt rising upward and then settling back against the finger.
71, 59 N. Y. pope, Se: Adams v. Brennan, 72 Miss. 894, 18 uth. 482.—Assessment work... Under the mining laws of the United States, the holder of an unpatented mining claim on the public domain is required, in order to hold his claim, to do labor or...
a 76 Fed. 543; Kdwards County v. Jennings (Tex. Civ. App.) 33° S. W. 585.
655; .Arnold v. State, 29 Ala. 50; Lafferty v. State, 41 Tex. Cr. R. 606, 56 8. W. 628; Bentley v. State, 82 Ala. 599;
37, 54 Pac. 369; Cummington v. Wareham, 9 Cush. (Mass.) 585; French v.
Lat. In public law. War. Ah armed contest between nations; the state of those who forcibly contend with each other. Jus belli, the law of war.
(D. C.) 105 Fed. 74. But the term is also applied to a port in any state other than the state where the vessel belongs or her owner resides. ‘The Canada (D. nee Fed. 124; The Lulu, 10 Wall. 200, 19 L. Ed. 906; Negus v. Simpson, 99 Mass. 893.—Home...
221, 20 N. B. 115, 3 L. R. A. 261; State v. Lee, 29 Minn. 445, 18 N. W. 918.
KEYUS. A guardian, warden, or keeper.
A book of the highest authority in admiralty matters, generally supposed to have been compiled during the reign of Edward
424, 22 8. W. 370. Also, a plan or project; a scheme to trick or deceive; a stratagem or artifice; as in the laws relating to fraud and cheating. State v.
324; State v. Williams, 32 La.
814, 21 S. B. 1380; State v. Munger, 15 Vt. 293; Allred v.
317; New Mexico vy. United States Trust Co., 172 U. 8. 171, 19 Sup. Ct. 128, 43 L. Ed. 407; Stuyvesant v.
2, 3, United States Comptroller’s Decisions.
505; Allen v. State, 111 Ala. 80, 20 South, 494; State v. Rover, 11
510, 58 N. E. 221; Warner
625; Harward v. Davenport, 105 Iowa, 592, 75 N. W. 487; -Trauerman v. Lippincott, 39 Mo. App. 488; Everett v. Richmond & D. R. Co., 121 N. C. 319, 27 S. BD. 991; Birmingham Ry. & El. Co. v. Pinckard, 124 Ala. 372, 26 South. 880. ’ Reckless sport; w...
1, 84 South. 3807; State v. Brittain, 89 N. G 576; People v.
v. Norfolk & O. V. R. Co., 86 Fed. 738, 82 C. O. A. 81; People v. Board of Po- Hee, 75 N. Y. 88; Binance Co v. Charleston, 0. & C. R. Co. (C. C.) 52 Fed. 527; State v.
446; State v. Sutcliffe. 4 448; Bryant v. State, 60 Ga. 358; Fletcher v. State, 10 Lea (Tenn.) 339.
201; State v. Ingram, 16 Kan. 19; State v. Dunnavant, 3 Brev. (8S. CG) 10, 5 Am. Dec. 580; State v. Gooch, 60 Ark. 218, 232 S. W. 640; Davis v. Collier, 13 Ga. 491. Compare Richardson v. Chicago & A. R. Co., 149 Mo. 311, 50 S. W. 782.
v. Youngstown Coke Co., 86 Fed. 585, 30 C. C. A. 208; Porter v. Railroad Co., 76 Ill. 573; State v. Payne, 129 Mo. 468, 31 S. W. 797, 33 L. R. A. 576; Farmers’ L. & v. Freud, 138 Cal. 631, 72 Pac. 3435.
330, 11 S. W. 412; U.S. v. Ford (D. C.) 34 Fed. 26; Com. vy. Eagan, 190 Pa. 10, 42 Atl. 374.
(N. Y.) 296; Emmerson v. State, 33 Tex. Cr. R. 89, 25 S. W. 280;
452; State v. Hodgson, 66
(or Cald. J. P. or Cald. 8.C.). Caldecott’s English Magistrate’s (Justice of the Peace) and Settlement Cases.