Dodds, 54 W. Va
289. 46 S. BE. 228: State v.
Category: International Law
Found 564 results · Showing 121–150
Dowling v. Polack, 18 Cal
627; Brackenridge v. State, 27 Tex. App. 513, 11 8. W. 630, 4
Downs v. United States, 118 Fed
147, 51 OC. Cc. A. 100.
DROMONES, DROMOS
DA. These were at first high ships of great burden, but afterwards those which we now call “men-of-war.” Jacob.
Dunnam, 98 Ala
610, 18 South. 599; Ring v. Ring, 112 Ga. 854, 38 S. B. 330; State v.
Dvansville v. State, 118 Ind
426, 21 N. BL 267, 4%. R. A. 93.
Dyer v. Dyer, 17 R. I. 547, 23 Atl
910; State v. Melvin, 166 Mo. 565, 66 S. W. 534; Poe y. State, 72 Tex. = 10 8S. W. 732. pee ae
E. 50, 60 Am. St. Rep
753; Fry v. State, 63 Ind. 562, 80 Am. Rep. 238; Webb v.
E. 648, 60 Am. Rep
429; People v. Com’rs, 23 N. Y. 219; State v. Jones, 51 Ohio St. 492, 87 N. E. 945; Burrall v. Railroad Co., 75 N. Y. 216.
EASTERLY
EASTERLY. This wofd, when used alone, will be construed to mean “due east.” But that is a rule of necessity growing out of the indefiniteness of the term, and has bo application where other words are used for the purpose of qualifying its meaning...
Edward IV
4 Reeve, Eng. Law, c. 25, p. 117.
Edward IV., but is now lost
1 Bl. Comm. 64, 65. - DOMESDAY, DOMESDAY - BOOK.
EMPLOYER
cfal employment, it is understood to mean some permanent employment or position.” The word is more extensive than “clerk” or “officer.” It signifies any one in place, or having charge or using a function, as well as one in office. See Ritte...
EMPTOR
Lat. A buyer or purchaser. Used in the maxim “caveat emptor,” let the buyer beware; i. e., the buyer of an article must be on his guard and take the risks of his purchase.
EO LOCI
Lat. In the civil law. In that state or condition; in that place, (eo loco.) Calvin.
ESTANDARD
L. Fr. A standard, (of weights and measures.) So called because it stands constant and immovable, and hath all other measures coming towards it for their conformity. Termes de la Ley.
ESTENDAED, ESTENDART, or
STANDARD. An ensign for horsemen in war.
Ev
331; State v. Grant, 86 Iowa, 216, 53 N. bi 120; Ernest v. State, 20 Fla. 388; Hogan
Ex parte Bell, 19 Fla
612;' Barnhart v. State, 154 Ind. 177, 56 N. E. 212; People v. Righetti, 66 Cal. 184, 4 Pac. 1185.—Simple larceny. Larceny which is not complicated or aggravated with acts of violence. _ Larceny from the person, or with force and violence, is calle...
Ex parte Janes, 1 Nev
319; State v. Wolfer, 53 Minn. 135, 54 N. W. 1065, 19 L. R. A. 783, 39 Am. St. Rep. 582; State v. Barnes, 32 S.
EX RELATIONE
tion of an ew post facto law is sanctioned by long usage. Strong y. State, 1 Blackf. (Ind.
EXAMINATION
search; interrogating.
EXPOSITION
Explanation; interpretation. EXPOSITION DE PART. In French
EXPRESS
EXPRESS. Made known distinctly and explicitly, and not left to inference or implication. Declared in terms; set forth in words. Manifested by direct and appropriate language, as distinguished from that which is inferred from conduct. The word is usua...
Fairlamb, 121 Mo
137, 25 S. W. 895; Milton v. State. 6 Neb. 148; State v. Greenleaf, 71
FIGHT. An encounter, with blows
or other personal violence, between two persons. See State v. Gladden, 73 N. C. 155; Carpenter v. People, 31 Colo. 284, 72 Pac. 1072; Coles v. New York Casualty Co., 87 App.
Finn v. Spagnoli, 67 Cal
330, 7 Pac. 746; In re Chauncey, 32 Hun (N. Y.) 431; Bullard ‘vy. Kuhl, 54 Wis. 545, 11 N. W. 801; Spencer v. Thistle, 18 Neb. 229, 18 N. W. 214; State v. Brown, 638 Mo. 444; State v. Clifton, 57
Fish. Pat
(or Fish. Pat. Cas.). Fisher’s United States Patent Cases.
Fish. Pat. Rep
fFisher’s United States Patent Reports. ; . Bish. Prise (or Pr. Cas.). Fisher's United States Prize Cases. ;
FISTUCA
erally extending indefinitely downward. See