Haley v. State, Neb
556, 60 N. W. 962, 47 Am. St. Rep. 718; State v. Winters, 44
Category: International Law
Found 564 results · Showing 181–210
HALLE-GEMOTE. In Saxon law
dHaligemot, (q. v.) HALLUCINATION. In medical juris-
Hannibal v. Winchell
54 Mo. 177; Haynes vy. State, 15 Ohio St. 455; Davis v. Campbell,
Har
(Ael.). MHarrington’s Reports, vols. 2-5 Delaware.
Hardware Co., 94 Ala
346, 10 South. 304: Cooley v. Perrine, 41 N. J. Law, 325, 32 Am.
Hardware Co., 98 Ga
249, 25 8. E. 403, 58
Hartford v. State, 96 Ind
463, 49 Am. Rep. 185.
HASRETARE
in old English law. To give a right of inheritance, or make the donation hereditary to the grantee and his heirs. Cowell.
Hawkins vy. Roberts, 122 Ala
180, 27 South. 327; State v. Cooley, 56 Minn. 546, 58 N. W. 150; Wagner v. Milwaukee County, 112 Wis, 601, 88 N. W. 577; State v. Brewing Co., 104
Hayes Min. Co., 141 Cal
360, 74 Pac. 1049; United States v. St. Anthony R. Co., 192 U. 8. 524, 24 Sup. Ct. 333, 48 L. Ed. 548. But see Miller v. Cabell, 81 Ky. 184; In re Sadler, 142 Pa. 511, 21 AtL 978.
Haynes v. State, 15 Ohio St
455; Garner v. State, 5 Lea, 213; State v. Greef.wood, 76
Hays, 21 Ind
176; State v. Wilkins, 17 Vt
HEALTHY
Free from disease or bodily ailment, or any state of the system pecu- Harly susceptible or liable to disease or ce} ily ailment. Bell v. Jeffreys, 35 N. C. 356.
HEAT OF PASSION
are regulated by local laws.—PubHe health. As one of the objects of the police power of the state, the “public health” means the. prevailingly healthful or sanitary condition of the general body of people or the community in mass, and the absen...
Helm. Helm’s Reports, vols
2-9 Nevada. ' Hem. Hempstead, United States -—Hemmingway, Mississippi.
Hickey v. State, 23 Ind
23. And see U. S. v. Howell (D. C.) 64 Fed. 114; Spencer v.
Hilt
(N. Y¥.) 328. And see Wood v. Mathews, 47 Iowa, 410; State v. Curran, 51 Iowa, 112, 49 N. W. 1006.
Hood vy. State, 56 Ind
263, 26 Am. Rep. 21; State v. Connoway, on ebe: (Ohio) 90+ State y.
HOST
L. Fr. An army. Britt. ec 22, A military expedition; war. Kelham.
How. State Tr
1182. Otherwise expressed, ad cautelam en superabundanti. Id. 1163. 878, 1087. 715.
Howard vy. Ingersoll, 18 How
427, 14 L. Ed. 189. And see Paine Lumber Co. v. U. S. (C. C.) 55 Fed. 864; Alabama v. Georgia, 23 How. 515, 16 L. Ed. 556; Hatght v. Keokuk, 4 Iowa, 213; Pulley v. Municipality
Howard, 136 Cal
482, 64 Pac. 692, 89 Am. St.
Howards
3 Bl. Comm. 68, 103; Steph.
Howe, 26 Or
181, 37 Pac. 536; State v. Grant, 79 Mo. 129, 49 Am. Rep. 218.
Hulett, 50 Kan
440, 31 Pac. 1092; State v.
Hurst v. Hurst, 7 W. Va
297; New York vy. Stone, 20 Wend. (N. Y.) 142; State v. Me
HWATA, HWATUNG
law. Augtry; divination...
I. 288, 48 Atl
866, 45 L. R. A. 269; Raynor v. State, 62 Wis. 288, 22 N. W. 480; Nelson v. State Board of Health, 108 Ky. 760, 57 8. W. 501, 50 L. R. A. 383.
Il]
200. N. 110; Moran v. Stewart, 173
Illinois Cent. R. Co
v. State. 146 U. S. 387, 13 Sup. Ct. 110, 36 L. Ed. 1018.