In
French modern European isw. A. warrant of protection and authority to travel, granted to persons moving from place to place, by the competent officer. Brande.
Category: International Law
Found 564 results · Showing 211–240
In re Rowe, 77 Fed
161, 23 C. C. A. 108; People v. Bolanger, 71 Cal. 17, 11 Pac. 799; Polk v. State, 36 Ark. 117: Armstrong y. State, 33 Tex. Cr. R. 417, 20 S. W. 829.
In re Voorhees
32 N. J. Law, 150; State -v.
IN TERMINIS TERMINANTIBUS. In
terms of determination;- exactly in point. 11 Coke, 40d. In express or determinate terms. 1 Leon. 98.
Incaute factum pro non facto
habetur. A thing done unwarily (or unadvisedly) will be taken as not done. Dig. 28, 4, 1.
INCONSULTO
Lat. In the civil law.
Ind, 288;, McDaniel vy. State, 16 Miss
401, 47 Am. Dec. 98.
INDICTIO
laration; a proclamation. declaration or indiction of war. ment.
INFRA ANNUM LUCTUS
officer inated ‘of rts yg jury. U. S. v. Borger (C, 93; State v. Barrell, 75 Vt. 202, Ps re 183, 98 Am. St. Rep. 813. —Information in the nature of a quo warranto. aA proceeding against the usurper of a franchise or office. See QUO WARRANTO. —I...
INSTITUTIO HZREDIS
Lat. In Ro man law. The appointment of the hAres in the will. It corresponds very nearly to the nomination of an executor in English law. Without such an appolntment the will was vuid at law, but the pretor (é. e., equity) would, under certain circu...
Iowa) 172; Wortham v. State, 59 Miss
182; State v. Gupton, 30 N. C. 271.
J. Law, 461; State v. Mumford, 73 Mo
650, 39 Am. Rep. 582; U.S. v. Politzer (D. C.) 59
Jaqueth
1 Lans. (N. Y.) 210; The Delaware, 14
Johnson, 60 Minn
337, 62 N. W. 388; Ross v. Ward, 14 S. D. 240, 85 N. W. 182, 86 Am.
July 13, 1866, § 9 (14 St
at Large, 118). And see Carpenter v. Taylor, 1 Hilt. (N. Y.). 195; State v. Hall, 738 N. O. 283.
JURISCONSULTUS
Lat. In Roman law. An expert in juridical science; a person thoroughly versed in the laws, who was habitually resorted to, for information and advice, both by private persons as his cilents, and also by the magistrates, advocates, and others employed...
JUS CIVILE
an inchoate .or incomplete right to a thing; the latter, a ga) Un and perfect right to a thing. See The rlos F. Roses, 177 U. S. 655, 20 Sup. Ct. 803, 44 L. Ed. 929; The Young law each people has settled for itself is peculiar to the state itself, a...
JUS PATRONATUS
or less purity, in the laws of all nations. And, conversely, they held that if any rule or principle of law was observed in common by all peoples with whose systems they were
Kean, 69 N. H. 122, 45 Atl
256, 48 L. R. A. 102; State v. Pomeroy, 73 Wis. 664, 41 N. W. 726: Barton v. Campbell, 54 Ohio St. 147, 42 N. BE. 698; Grand Rapids v. Hughes, 15 Mich. 57; State v. Leaver, 62 Wis. 387, 22 N. W. 576.
Kennedy, 9 Wall
390, 19 L. Ed. 736; Turner v. State, 1 Ohio St. 426; Sheldon vy. Sill, 8
Kenzie, 42 Me
302; U. S. v. Barrett (D. C.) 111 Fed. 369; State v. Calvin, R. M. Charlit. (Ga.) 159; Mattison v. State, 3 Mo. 421.
Kohlhof v. Chicago, 192 Ill
249, 61 N. 4H. 446, 85 Am. St. Rep. 333; Challiss v. Parker, 11 Kan. 391; State v. Berdetta, 73 Ind. 185, 38 Am. Rep. 117; Pequignot v. Detroit (C.
L. Kd
648; Schulte v. Keokuk County, 74 Iowa, 292, 37 N. W. 376; Sigsbee v. State, 43
L. OC. R
* L. D. (or Dec.). United States.
L. R. A. 218, 46 Am. St. Rep
528; Eppright v. Kauffman, 90 Mo. 25, 1S. W. 786; State
L. R. A. 426; Com
v. McNamee, 112 Mass. 286; State v. Ryan, 70 Wis. 676, 36 N. W. 823 ;) or pera as pynony mous with “public,” (Com. vy. Whitney, 5 Gray [Mass.] 86.)
L. R. A. 570; Daniels v. State, 91 Ga
1, 16 S. E. 97. See Haynie v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S. W. 25.
L.J.N.8
London (1831 onwards).
Ld. Raym
1015; Scholes v. Liargreaves, 5 Term, 46; Hubbard v. Hubbard, 15 Adol. & 417; Kebl. 563. An allodial pro- _prietor, as distinguished from a vassal or feudatory. This was the sense of the term in the laws of the barbarous nations of Europe.
Legnard, 70 Pa
192; Stewart v. Bedell, 79